Online
Group Show
Daily Program / Season #2
Feb 26 - Aug 20, 2025
Overview
“We need to pay attention to what artists are doing. They have the sensibility to foresee where our world is going, and we need to support their visions.“
- Alejandro Cartagena
Details
The Daily Program Season 2 follows from the first year of the Fellowship Daily Program, showcasing outstanding works from select artists who emerged during the inaugural period. Each month, we curate exceptional artworks, still images, GIFs, and videos, from this talented group, presenting them prominently in the first week of each month.
The Fellowship Daily Program's first year was dedicated to AI video, documenting one of the medium's most rapidly evolving periods. With contributions from 137 artists worldwide, creating over 3,500 unique works, the program stands as a comprehensive exploration of AI video's technical, aesthetic, and conceptual advancements from 2023 to 2024. Artists experimented boldly, from SORA to text-to-story narratives, significantly advancing their individual voices and the capabilities of the medium.
Looking forward, the Daily Program Season 2 focuses on a carefully chosen group of artists whose exceptional potential we are committed to supporting through dedicated curation, mentorship, and promotion throughout 2025. As AI tools rapidly evolve, these artists are at the forefront, exploring new dimensions within their creative practice. The Daily Program Season 2 provides a supportive platform for artists to share their evolving journeys, breakthroughs, and ongoing dialogues with both their peers and collectors.
Artworks:
Featured
All
Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio
Rung
2025
What if progress is only the repetition of familiar forms?
“Rung” is a climb without end. The AI links each frame to the next not by visual rhythm, not by narrative. It hyperlinks from frame to frame of ladders and climbers, looping through its own visual memory, in a gesture of persistence, an almost-sense of progress, without breakthrough. The men ascend, shift, sometimes falter, but always remain within that logic of recurrence.
Project Description: Native
“Native” is an evolving AI video project that explores the perceptual logic of AI image-to-video generators, what they do when given minimal or no prompting and allowed to animate according to their own rationale. Rather than using AI to illustrate human-conceived narratives, I work in reverse: I set various specific conditions that invite the AI to express itself in its own “native” visual language.
In this context, what is commonly called AI “hallucination" is not treated as failure, but as a meta condition of emergence. I watch this state of potential, and harvest resonant extrapolations and interpolations, gestures such as spatial imagination, involuntary interpolation, and hyperlink logic. In so doing, I try to recognize diffusion-based behavior or even a kind of quantum uncertainty within what is often regarded as a fixed, predetermined algorithmic LLM system.
I then reassemble these emergent gestures into video works that both reflect AI’s native expression and offer me a way to intuitively make meaning from it as a human artist. Though the final video, through its initial image prompt, sequence, pacing, and title, echoes my voice as an artist and may guide the viewer’s attention, I try not to lead their understanding. Instead, each work intends to become a field of open resonance. However, leaning further into AI’s native gesture and away from narrative is like a process of letting go for me.
While working on Native, I am learning that, among others, thinker Erin Manning's idea of the “minor gesture” could be applied to the subtle, often overlooked expressions when AI systems are allowed to drift. I also think about artists like Trevor Paglen, who interrogates machine perception, asking how systems visualize and what those visual logics reveal. Together, and with other thinkers and artists, they have offered at least a partial framework for moving beyond prompt and result, toward a more relational, emergent vocabulary of image-making with AI.
Native is also helping me expand my understanding of human cognition and creativity. At the same time, it’s allowing me to reclaim my previous practice before disability and AI, one grounded in both conceptual inquiry and relational aesthetics. My own native tongue.
So, where does authorship, agency, and meaning come from, us, the machine, or what passes between?
A provisional answer:
I retain authorship of the final video,
agency passes between the machine and me,
and meaning lies with you, the viewer.
Sound design by Barbara Chira.
Listen to an Audio Reflection from Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio discussing this work.